Gender, language and floor apportionment in political debates
Shaw, Sylvia (2000) Gender, language and floor apportionment in political debates. Discourse and Society, 11 (3) . pp. 401-418. ISSN 0957-9265 [Article] (doi:10.1177/0957926500011003006)
Abstract
Political debates are speech events which foreground issues of power and the `floor', and allow the opportunity of assessing the ways in which the gender of participants affects their construction as more or less powerful participants in debates. Debates in the British House of Commons are adversarial in style, making it appropriate to view the floor as `the site of a contest where there is a winner and a loser'. Previous research into political debates has found that male participants violate the formal rules in debates more than their female counterparts, in order to gain the floor. Although the canonical form and rules of debates exist to `permit the equalization of turns', rule violations are common, and inequalities between participants exist. In this article legal and illegal interventions are evaluated in five debates in order to establish the extent to which the gender of participants is related to the control that an individual has over the debate floor.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Research Areas: | A. > School of Media and Performing Arts > Media > English Language and Literature |
ISI Impact: | 12 |
Item ID: | 5314 |
Useful Links: | |
Depositing User: | Sylvia Shaw |
Date Deposited: | 04 May 2010 10:34 |
Last Modified: | 24 Mar 2017 14:16 |
URI: | https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/id/eprint/5314 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.