Traditional Communication Formats v SGML, Metadata, Dublin Core: Traditional Communication Formats: MARC is far from dead
Hopkinson, Alan (1994) Traditional Communication Formats v SGML, Metadata, Dublin Core: Traditional Communication Formats: MARC is far from dead. In: Traditional Communication Formats v SGML, Metadata, Dublin Core, 1995, Vilnius, National Library of Lithuania. . [Conference or Workshop Item]
|
PDF
Download (86kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This section is entitled Traditional Communication Formats v SGML, Metadata, Dublin Core. Is there a
subject here that needs to be debated?
I hope to show that the two, the traditional and the more recent formats, are complimentary not adversary. But
to do this I need to explain why there is even a feeling that the traditional and the new might be opposed. I
need to explain why the question has been asked.
I am going to try and answer two questions: Do we still need MARC?; and Are MARC and the other 'formats'
competing for the same role?
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Paper) |
---|---|
Research Areas: | A. > Library and Student Support |
Item ID: | 5197 |
Depositing User: | Repository team |
Date Deposited: | 15 Apr 2010 17:36 |
Last Modified: | 13 Jun 2021 06:25 |
URI: | https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/id/eprint/5197 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.