Traditional Communication Formats v SGML, Metadata, Dublin Core: Traditional Communication Formats: MARC is far from dead

Hopkinson, Alan (1994) Traditional Communication Formats v SGML, Metadata, Dublin Core: Traditional Communication Formats: MARC is far from dead. In: Traditional Communication Formats v SGML, Metadata, Dublin Core, 1995, Vilnius, National Library of Lithuania. . [Conference or Workshop Item]

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (86kB) | Preview

Abstract

This section is entitled Traditional Communication Formats v SGML, Metadata, Dublin Core. Is there a
subject here that needs to be debated?
I hope to show that the two, the traditional and the more recent formats, are complimentary not adversary. But
to do this I need to explain why there is even a feeling that the traditional and the new might be opposed. I
need to explain why the question has been asked.
I am going to try and answer two questions: Do we still need MARC?; and Are MARC and the other 'formats'
competing for the same role?

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Research Areas: A. > Library and Student Support
Item ID: 5197
Depositing User: Repository team
Date Deposited: 15 Apr 2010 17:36
Last Modified: 13 Jun 2021 06:25
URI: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/id/eprint/5197

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Statistics

Activity Overview
6 month trend
300Downloads
6 month trend
453Hits

Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.