Media coverage and speculation about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on suicide: A content analysis of UK news

Marzano, Lisa ORCID logoORCID:, Hawley, Monica, Fraser, Lorna, Lainez, Yasmine, Marsh, James and Hawton, Keith ORCID logoORCID: (2023) Media coverage and speculation about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on suicide: A content analysis of UK news. BMJ Open, 25 (4) . pp. 953-960. ISSN 2044-6055 [Article] (doi:10.1111/dom.14922)

PDF - Published version (with publisher's formatting)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0.

Download (732kB) | Preview
[img] PDF - Final accepted version (with author's formatting)
Restricted to Repository staff and depositor only

Download (355kB)


Objectives: Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been much concern and speculation about rises in suicide rates, despite evidence that suicides did not in fact increase in the first year of the pandemic in most countries with real-time suicide data. This public narrative is potentially harmful, as well as misleading, and is likely to be perpetuated by sensational news coverage.
Method: Using a bespoke database, we analysed the quality and content of print and online UK news (including opinion pieces) on the impact of COVID-19 on suicidality, based on adherence to international recommendations. Chi-square tests were conducted to examine variability in relation to key characteristics (e.g., type of publication) and to four ‘restriction phases’ (based on UK government official lockdown measures) over the first 14 months of the pandemic.
Results: We identified 372 stories about COVID-19 and suicidality in online and print news between the first UK lockdown (March 2020) and May 2021 (when restrictions were significantly eased in the UK). Throughout this period, over a third of articles (39.2%) and headlines (41.4%) claimed or predicted a rise in suicide, often attributed to feelings of entrapment and poor mental health (especially amongst young people), and fueled by expert commentary and speculation. Almost a third of reports were rated as being of negative quality (116, 31.2%), and at least half included no signposting to help and support. However, reporting improved in phases of less stringent COVID-19 restrictions and over time, with later articles and headlines including fewer negative statements and predictions about rises in suicides, and greater reliance on academic evidence.
Conclusions: As the longer-term consequences of the pandemic develop, and other national and global events unfold, it is increasingly important that the media, and the wider community of experts shaping its narratives, strive for a positive and evidence-informed approach to news coverage of suicide.

Item Type: Article
Sustainable Development Goals:
Research Areas: A. > School of Science and Technology > Psychology
Item ID: 37533
Depositing User: Lisa Marzano
Date Deposited: 27 Feb 2023 15:47
Last Modified: 12 May 2023 12:22

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Activity Overview
6 month trend
6 month trend

Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.