The value of experiments in futures and foresight science as illustrated by the case of scenario planning
Derbyshire, James ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1505-412X, Dhami, Mandeep K.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6157-3142, Belton, Ian and Onkal, Dilek
(2022)
The value of experiments in futures and foresight science as illustrated by the case of scenario planning.
Futures & Foresight Science
, e146.
ISSN 2573-5152
[Article]
(Published online first)
(doi:10.1002/ffo2.146)
|
PDF
- Published version (with publisher's formatting)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0. Download (410kB) | Preview |
|
![]() |
PDF
- Final accepted version (with author's formatting)
Restricted to Repository staff and depositor only Download (303kB) |
Abstract
An already pressing need to evidence the effectiveness of futures and foresight tools has been further amplified by the coronavirus pandemic, which highlighted more mainstream tools’ difficulty with uncertainty. In light of this, the recent discussion in this journal on providing futures and foresight science with a stronger scientific basis is welcome. In this discussion critical realism has been proffered as a useful philosophical foundation and experiments a useful method for improving this field’s scientific basis. Yet, experiments seek to isolate specific causal effects through closure (i.e., by controlling for all extraneous factors) and this may cause it to jar with critical realism’s emphasis on uncertainty and openness. We therefore extend the recent discussion on improving the scientific basis of futures and foresight science by doing three things. Firstly, we elaborate on critical realism and why the experimental method may jar with it. Secondly, we explain why the distinction between a conceptual and a direct replication can help overcome this jarring, meaning experiments can still be a valuable research tool for a futures and foresight science underpinned by critical realism. Thirdly, we consider the appropriate unit of analysis for experiments on futures and foresight tools. In so doing, we situate the recent discussion on improving the scientific basis of futures and foresight science within the much longer running one on improving the scientific basis of business, management and strategy research more broadly. We use the case of scenario planning to illustrate our argument in relation to futures and foresight science.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Theme: | |
Keywords (uncontrolled): | critical realism, experimental methods, scenario planning |
Research Areas: | A. > Business School A. > School of Science and Technology > Psychology |
Item ID: | 36819 |
Notes on copyright: | © 2022 The Authors. Futures & Foresight Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
Useful Links: | |
Depositing User: | James Derbyshire |
Date Deposited: | 21 Nov 2022 12:10 |
Last Modified: | 02 Dec 2022 07:13 |
URI: | https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/id/eprint/36819 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.