Group versus one‐to‐one multi‐component lifestyle interventions for weight management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Abbott, S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1895-1942, Smith, Elizabeth ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8077-4908, Tighe, B. and Lycett, D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4525-6419 (2021) Group versus one‐to‐one multi‐component lifestyle interventions for weight management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 34 (3) . pp. 485-493. ISSN 0952-3871 [Article] (doi:10.1111/jhn.12853)

[img] PDF (Article: main text) - Final accepted version (with author's formatting)
Restricted to Repository staff and depositor only until 26 December 2021.

Download (362kB) |
[img] PDF (Article: Figure 1, Table 1, Figure 2, Figure 3) - Final accepted version (with author's formatting)
Restricted to Repository staff and depositor only until 26 December 2021.

Download (185kB) |
[img] PDF (Supporting Information: Appendix S1-S3) - Supplementary material
Restricted to Repository staff and depositor only until 26 December 2021.

Download (182kB) |

Abstract

Background
Multi-component lifestyle interventions that incorporate diet, physical activity and behaviour change are effective for weight management. However, it is not clear whether delivery in a group or one-to-one format influences weight loss efficacy. The present study aimed to systematically review the evidence of the effectiveness of group compared to one-to-one multi-component lifestyle interventions for weight management.
Methods
MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL and ISRCTN databases were searched from inception up to February 2020 for randomised controlled trials comparing group versus one-to-one multi-component lifestyle interventions for weight loss in adults with a body mass index ≥ 25 kg m–2. The primary outcome was weight loss (kg) at 12 months and the secondary outcome was attainment of ≥5% weight loss at 12 months. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Meta-analysis used random effects and estimated risk ratios and continuous inverse variance methods. Heterogeneity was investigated using I2 statistics and sensitivity analyses.
Results
Seven randomised controlled trials with 2576 participants were included. Group interventions were favoured over one-to-one interventions for weight loss at 12 months (−1.9 kg, 95% confidence interval = −1.3 to −2.6; I2 = 99%). Participants of group interventions were more likely to attain ≥5% weight loss at 12 months relative to one-to-one interventions (relative risk = 1.58, 95% confidence interval = 1.25–2.00; I2 = 60%).
Conclusions
Group multi-component lifestyle interventions are superior for weight loss compared to one-to-one interventions with respect to adult weight management. Further research is required to determine whether specific components of group interventions can explain the superiority of weight loss outcomes in group interventions.

Item Type: Article
Keywords (uncontrolled): Nutrition and Dietetics, Medicine (miscellaneous)
Research Areas: A. > School of Science and Technology > London Sport Institute > Sports Coaching and Education at the London Sport Institute
Item ID: 33369
Notes on copyright: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Abbott, S., Smith, E., Tighe, B. and Lycett, D. (2021), Group versus one-to-one multi-component lifestyle interventions for weight management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Hum Nutr Diet, 34: 485-493, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12853. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.
Useful Links:
Depositing User: Jisc Publications Router
Date Deposited: 07 Jul 2021 20:57
Last Modified: 01 Aug 2021 16:20
URI: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/id/eprint/33369

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Statistics

Downloads
Activity Overview
3Downloads
41Hits

Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.