Public involvement in the governance of population-level biomedical research: unresolved questions and future directions

Erikainen, Sonja ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1442-3050, Friesen, Phoebe, Rand, Leah, Jongsma, Karin ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8135-6786, Dunn, Michael ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5603-6200, Sorbie, Annie, McCoy, Matthew ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5273-3877, Bell, Jessica, Burgess, Michael, Chen, Haidan, Chico, Vicky, Cunningham-Burley, Sarah ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0009-7653, Darbyshire, Julie ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7655-1963, Dawson, Rebecca, Evans, Andrew, Fahy, Nick, Finlay, Teresa, Frith, Lucy ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8506-0699, Goldenberg, Aaron, Hinton, Lisa, Hoppe, Nils, Hughes, Nigel, Koenig, Barbara, Lignou, Sapfo, McGowan, Michelle, Parker, Michael, Prainsack, Barbara, Shabani, Mahsa, Staunton, Ciara ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3185-440X, Thompson, Rachel, Varnai, Kinga, Vayena, Effy, Williams, Oli, Williamson, Max, Chan, Sarah and Sheehan, Mark (2021) Public involvement in the governance of population-level biomedical research: unresolved questions and future directions. Journal of Medical Ethics, 47 (7) . pp. 522-525. ISSN 0306-6800 [Article] (doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106530)

Preview

PDF - Published version (with publisher's formatting) Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (385kB) | Preview

Abstract

Population-level biomedical research offers new opportunities to improve population health, but also raises new challenges to traditional systems of research governance and ethical oversight. Partly in response to these challenges, various models of public involvement in research are being introduced. Yet, the ways in which public involvement should meet governance challenges are not well understood. We conducted a qualitative study with 36 experts and stakeholders using the World Café method to identify key governance challenges and explore how public involvement can meet these challenges. This brief report discusses four cross-cutting themes from the study: the need to move beyond individual consent; issues in benefit and data sharing; the challenge of delineating and understanding publics; and the goal of clarifying justifications for public involvement. The report aims to provide a starting point for making sense of the relationship between public involvement and the governance of population-level biomedical research, showing connections, potential solutions and issues arising at their intersection. We suggest that, in population-level biomedical research, there is a pressing need for a shift away from conventional governance frameworks focused on the individual and towards a focus on collectives, as well as to foreground ethical issues around social justice and develop ways to address cultural diversity, value pluralism and competing stakeholder interests. There are many unresolved questions around how this shift could be realised, but these unresolved questions should form the basis for developing justificatory accounts and frameworks for suitable collective models of public involvement in population-level biomedical research governance. [Abstract copyright: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.]

Actions (login required)

View Item

Statistics

DownloadsShow export options

Export as CSVXMLJSON

Activity Overview

6 month trend

123Downloads

6 month trend

100Hits

Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.