The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education

Winstone, Naomi E. and Boud, David ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6883-2722 (2022) The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 47 (3) . pp. 656-667. ISSN 0307-5079 [Article] (doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687)

[img]
Preview
PDF - Final accepted version (with author's formatting)
Download (386kB) | Preview

Abstract

In contemporary higher education systems, the processes of assessment and feedback are often seen as coexisting activities. As a result, they have become entangled in both policy and practice, resulting in a conceptual and practical blurring of their unique purposes. In this paper, we present a critical examination of the issues created by the entanglement of assessment and feedback, arguing that it is important to ensure that the legitimate purposes of both feedback and assessment are not compromised by inappropriate conflation of the two. We situate our argument in the shifting conceptual landscape of feedback, where there is increasing emphasis on students being active players in feedback processes working with and applying information from others to future learning tasks, rather than regarding feedback as a mechanism of transmission of information by teachers. We surface and critically discuss six problems created by the entanglement of assessment and feedback: students’ focus on grades; comments justifying grades rather than support learning; feedback too late to be useful; feedback subordinated to all other processes in course design; overemphasis on documentation of feedback; and the downgrading of feedback created by requirements for anonymous marking. We then propose a series of strategies for preserving the learning function of feedback, through models that give primacy to feedback within learning cycles. We conclude by offering suggestions for research and practice that seek to engage with the challenges created by the entanglement of assessment and feedback, and that maintain the unique purposes of assessment and feedback.

Item Type: Article
Keywords (uncontrolled): Assessment, feedback, summative, formative, students
Research Areas: A. > Work and Learning Research Centre
Item ID: 30593
Notes on copyright: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Studies in Higher Education on 16/06/2020, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687.
Useful Links:
Depositing User: David Boud
Date Deposited: 29 Jun 2020 18:37
Last Modified: 29 Nov 2022 17:34
URI: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/id/eprint/30593

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Statistics

Activity Overview
6 month trend
82Downloads
6 month trend
222Hits

Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.