Shaping flood risk governance through science-policy interfaces: insights from England, France and The Netherlands

Hegger, D. L. T., Alexander, Meghan, Raadgever, G. Tom, Priest, Sally J. ORCID logoORCID: and Bruzzone, Silvia (2020) Shaping flood risk governance through science-policy interfaces: insights from England, France and The Netherlands. Environmental Science & Policy, 106 . pp. 157-165. ISSN 1462-9011 [Article] (doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.002)

PDF - Published version (with publisher's formatting)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (1MB) | Preview
PDF - Final accepted version (with author's formatting)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0.

Download (414kB) | Preview


In the face of increasing threats from flooding, there are growing calls to strengthen and improve arrangements of flood risk governance (FRG). This endeavour requires an appreciation of the multitude of factors stabilising and driving governance dynamics. So-called catalyst flood events, policy champions and advocacy coalitions have tended to dominate this study to date, whilst the potential role played by Science Policy Interfaces (SPIs) has been somewhat neglected and often approached in a reductionist and fragmented way. This paper addresses this gap by drawing from in-depth policy analysis and stakeholder interviews conducted within England, France and the Netherlands under the auspices of the EU-FP7 STAR-FLOOD project. The analysis reveals four prominent ways in which SPIs shape FRG, by i) facilitating the diversification of Flood Risk Management (FRM) strategies; ii) increasing their connectivity, iii) facilitating a decentralisation of FRM and iv) fostering inter-country learning. It identifies different roles of specific interfaces (structures) and interfacing mechanisms (processes) in shaping governance dynamics. This way, the analysis reveals various ‘entry points’ through which SPIs can steer FRG, either along existing pathways, or towards new and potentially transformative change. The study shows that SPIs are a hitherto underexposed factor explaining dynamics in flood risk governance which merits additional systematic empirical study.

Item Type: Article
Research Areas: A. > School of Science and Technology > Flood Hazard Research Centre
Item ID: 29591
Notes on copyright: Published version: © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (
Final accepted version: © 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.
Useful Links:
Depositing User: Sally Priest
Date Deposited: 31 Mar 2020 10:26
Last Modified: 29 Nov 2022 18:31

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Activity Overview
6 month trend
6 month trend

Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.