Ease of predication does not account for imageability effects in performance: a reply to [Jones, 2002]

De Mornay Davies, Paul ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6205-5635 and Funnell, Elaine (2003) Ease of predication does not account for imageability effects in performance: a reply to [Jones, 2002]. Brain and Language, 87 (2) . pp. 305-310. ISSN 0093-934X [Article] (doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00107-X)

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (102kB) | Preview

Abstract

In this paper we defend our views against [Jones, 2002] claim that the criticism of the ease of predication hypothesis ( [Jones, 1985]) made by [de Mornay Davies and Funnell, 2000] is “fundamentally flawed.” Jones raises five issues concerning the content of the text, the reliability of effects of ease of predication, the generation of predicates, semantic features, and memory retrieval. We address each of these issues in turn and show that either a critical point raised is not made, or the point is mistaken. More importantly we show that our empirical findings, which are entirely overlooked by Jones, unequivocally support the view that ease of predication does not account for imageability effects in performance.

Item Type: Article
Research Areas: A. > School of Science and Technology > Psychology
A. > School of Science and Technology > Psychology > Language, Learning and Cognition group
Item ID: 2953
Useful Links:
Depositing User: Devika Mohan
Date Deposited: 30 Oct 2009 07:07
Last Modified: 30 Nov 2022 02:34
URI: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/id/eprint/2953

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Statistics

Activity Overview
6 month trend
378Downloads
6 month trend
544Hits

Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.