Semantic representation and ease of predication

De Mornay Davies, Paul ORCID logoORCID: and Funnell, Elaine (2000) Semantic representation and ease of predication. Brain and Language, 73 (1) . pp. 92-119. ISSN 0093-934X [Article] (doi:10.1006/brln.2000.2299)

Download (126kB) | Preview


Jones'(1985) Ease of Predication hypothesis, which states that underlying differences in the semantic representation of concrete and abstract words can be explained in terms of disproportionate numbers of semantic predicates, is explored in two experiments. The results suggest that (1) the advantage shown by concrete words in terms of greater number of predicates is only apparent for words of low frequency, and (2) Jones' ease of predication variable does not accurately reflect predicate distributions, or differences in imageability. Rather, it appears to represent differences in concreteness. As such, the validity of this concept as the basis of theories of semantic representation is questioned. Models based on the assumption of a “richer” semantic representation for concrete words are therefore not supported.

Item Type: Article
Research Areas: A. > School of Science and Technology > Psychology
A. > School of Science and Technology > Psychology > Language, Learning and Cognition group
Item ID: 2952
Useful Links:
Depositing User: Devika Mohan
Date Deposited: 30 Oct 2009 06:53
Last Modified: 28 Nov 2019 16:34

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Activity Overview
6 month trend
6 month trend

Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.