Concealment of birth: time to repeal a 200-year-old "convenient stop-gap"?

Milne, Emma (2019) Concealment of birth: time to repeal a 200-year-old "convenient stop-gap"? Feminist Legal Studies, 27 (2) . pp. 139-162. ISSN 0966-3622 [Article] (doi:10.1007/s10691-019-09401-6)

PDF - Final accepted version (with author's formatting)
Download (300kB) | Preview


Feminists have long argued that women who offend are judged by who they are, not what they do, with idealised images of femininity and motherhood used as measures of culpability. The ability to meet the expectations of motherhood and femininity are particularly difficult for women who experience a crisis pregnancy, as evident in cases where women have been convicted of concealment of birth. The offence prohibits the secret disposal of the dead body of a child, to conceal knowledge of its birth. Traditionally used to prosecute women suspected of killing their newborn children, analysis of court transcripts suggests the offence is also used to punish women who fail to meet expectations of motherhood. This paper analyses three contemporary cases in light of the historical origins of the offence, illustrating the legacy of prejudice against ‘deviant’ mothers. Finally, it questions the continued existence of this archaic offence.

Item Type: Article
Keywords (uncontrolled): Feminism; Gender justice; Women offenders; Newborn child death; Concealment of birth; Motherhood
Research Areas: A. > School of Law > Criminology and Sociology
Item ID: 26326
Notes on copyright: This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Feminist Legal Studies. The final authenticated version is available online at:
Useful Links:
Depositing User: Emma Milne
Date Deposited: 29 Mar 2019 08:41
Last Modified: 29 Nov 2022 18:58

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Activity Overview
6 month trend
6 month trend

Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.