What makes for effective feedback: staff and student perspectives

Dawson, Phillip, Henderson, Michael, Mahoney, Paige, Phillips, Michael, Ryan, Tracii, Boud, David ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6883-2722 and Molloy, Elizabeth (2019) What makes for effective feedback: staff and student perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44 (1) . pp. 25-36. ISSN 0260-2938 [Article] (doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1467877)

PDF - Final accepted version (with author's formatting)
Download (247kB) | Preview


Since the early 2010s the literature has shifted to view feedback as a process that students do where they make sense of information about work they have done, and use it to improve the quality of their subsequent work. In this view, effective feedback needs to demonstrate effects. However, it is unclear if educators and students share this understanding of feedback. This paper reports a qualitative investigation of what educators and students think the purpose of feedback is, and what they think makes feedback effective. We administered a survey on feedback that was completed by 406 staff and 4514 students from two Australian universities. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted on data from a sample of 323 staff with assessment responsibilities and 400 students. Staff and students largely thought the purpose of feedback was improvement. With respect to what makes feedback effective, staff mostly discussed feedback design matters like timing, modalities and connected tasks. In contrast, students mostly wrote that high-quality feedback comments make feedback effective – especially comments that are usable, detailed, considerate of affect and personalised to the student’s own work. This study may assist researchers, educators and academic developers in refocusing their efforts in improving feedback

Item Type: Article
Research Areas: A. > School of Health and Education > Education
A. > Work and Learning Research Centre
Item ID: 25803
Notes on copyright: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education on 30/04/2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/02602938.2018.1467877
Useful Links:
Depositing User: Repository team
Date Deposited: 12 Dec 2018 15:50
Last Modified: 29 Nov 2022 19:21
URI: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/id/eprint/25803

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Activity Overview
6 month trend
6 month trend

Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.