Gender differences in lying in sender-receiver games: a meta-analysis

Capraro, Valerio (2018) Gender differences in lying in sender-receiver games: a meta-analysis. Judgment and Decision Making, 13 (4). pp. 345-355. ISSN 1930-2975

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published version (with publisher's formatting)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (611kB) | Preview

Abstract

Whether there are gender di erences in lying has been largely debated in the past decade. Previous studies found mixed results. To shed light on this topic, here I report a meta-analysis of 8,728 distinct observations, collected in 65 Sender-Receiver game treatments, by 14 research groups. Following previous work and theoretical considerations, I distinguish three types of lies: black lies, which benefit the liar at a cost for another person; altruistic white lies, which benefit another person at a cost for the liar; and Pareto white lies, which benefit both the liar and another person. The results show that: males are significantly more likely than females to tell black lies (N=4,173); males are significantly more likely than females to tell altruistic white (N=2,940); and results are inconclusive in the case of Pareto white lies (N=1,615). Furthermore, gender di erences in telling altruistic white lies are significantly stronger than in the other two cases.

Item Type: Article
Research Areas: A. > Business School > Economics
Item ID: 25710
Useful Links:
Depositing User: Valerio Capraro
Date Deposited: 26 Nov 2018 12:08
Last Modified: 02 Apr 2019 10:21
URI: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/id/eprint/25710

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item

Full text downloads (NB count will be zero if no full text documents are attached to the record)

Downloads per month over the past year