The unemployed and the moral case for benefit sanctions

Daguerre, Anne (2015) The unemployed and the moral case for benefit sanctions. Journal of Social Security Law, 22 (3) . pp. 130-150. ISSN 1354-7747 [Article]

[img]
Preview
PDF - Final accepted version (with author's formatting)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0.

Download (370kB) | Preview

Abstract

This article assesses the Conservative-led Coalition Government’s (2010–2015) record on benefit sanctions and work-for-your-benefit (workfare) policies. It is argued that while the schemes largely built upon previous Labour Governments’ (1997–2010) policies, the Coalition Government also switched back to a traditional Conservative discourse, according to which jobseekers are part of a “work-shy” minority who live at the expense of the “hard working” taxpaying majority. The crackdown on unemployment benefits was broadly popular with the public, which explains why the Coalition Government was able to implement a relatively harsh benefit sanctions regime. Work-for-your-benefit policies, by contrast, were faced with a series of political and legal challenges.

Item Type: Article
Research Areas: A. > Business School > Leadership, Work and Organisations
Item ID: 19339
Notes on copyright: This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in the Journal of Social Security Law following peer review. The definitive published version Daguerre, Anne (2015) The unemployed and the moral case for benefit sanctions. Journal of Social Security Law, 22 (3). pp. 130-150. ISSN 1354-7747 is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service.
Useful Links:
Depositing User: Anne Daguerre
Date Deposited: 18 Apr 2016 11:19
Last Modified: 29 Nov 2022 22:23
URI: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/id/eprint/19339

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Statistics

Activity Overview
6 month trend
412Downloads
6 month trend
781Hits

Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.