Instructions on reasonable doubt: defining the standard of proof and the juror's task

Dhami, Mandeep K. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6157-3142, Lundrigan, Samantha and Mueller-Johnson, Katrin (2015) Instructions on reasonable doubt: defining the standard of proof and the juror's task. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 21 (2) . pp. 169-178. ISSN 1076-8971 [Article] (doi:10.1037/law0000038)

[img]
Preview
PDF (This article may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record) - Final accepted version (with author's formatting)
Download (591kB) | Preview

Abstract

[see journal for abstract] summary provided here:
In the present paper, we measure the effectiveness of two specific instructions on RD that have been used and challenged in the US. These are described in more detail below. We examine the effect of the two instructions on people’s quantitative interpretations of the standard, as well as the degree of inter- and intra-individual variability in interpretations. In addition, we attempt to explain the effectiveness of these instructions by examining the effect of their precise wording on interpretations of RD.

Item Type: Article
Research Areas: A. > School of Science and Technology > Psychology
Item ID: 16067
Notes on copyright: ©American Psychological Association, 2015. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000038
Useful Links:
Depositing User: Mandeep Dhami
Date Deposited: 18 May 2015 16:24
Last Modified: 06 Feb 2021 21:12
URI: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/id/eprint/16067

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Full text downloads (NB count will be zero if no full text documents are attached to the record)

Downloads per month over the past year