Quasirational models of sentencing

Dhami, Mandeep K. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6157-3142, Belton, Ian and Goodman-Delahunty, Jane (2015) Quasirational models of sentencing. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4 (3) . pp. 239-247. ISSN 2211-3681 [Article] (doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.07.009)

Preview

PDF - Published version (with publisher's formatting) Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0. Download (377kB) | Preview

Abstract

Cognitive continuum theory points to the middle-ground between the intuitive and analytic modes of cognition, called quasirationality. In the context of sentencing, we discuss how legal models prescribe the use of different modes of cognition. These models aim to help judges perform the cognitive balancing act required between factors indicating a more or less severe penalty for an offender. We compare sentencing in three common law jurisdictions (i.e., Australia, the US, and England and Wales). Each places a different emphasis on the use of intuition and analysis; but all are quasirational. We conclude that the most appropriate mode of cognition will likely be that which corresponds best with properties of the sentencingtask. Finally, we discuss the implications of this cognition-task correspondence approach for researchers and legal policy-makers.

Actions (login required)

View Item

Statistics

DownloadsShow export options

Export as CSVXMLJSON

Activity Overview

6 month trend

355Downloads

6 month trend

403Hits

Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.