Does it pay to be ethical? Evidence from the FTSE4Good

Belghitar, Yacine, Clark, Ephraim A. and Deshmukh, Nitin ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2038-8930 (2014) Does it pay to be ethical? Evidence from the FTSE4Good. Journal of Banking & Finance, 47 . pp. 54-62. ISSN 0378-4266 [Article] (doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.06.027)

Preview	PDF - Published version (with publisher's formatting) Download (332kB) | Preview
Preview	PDF - Final accepted version (with author's formatting) Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0. Download (208kB) | Preview

Abstract

The empirical mean-variance evidence comparing the performance of socially responsible investments (SRI) and conventional investments suggests that there is no significant difference between the two. This paper re-examines the problem in the context of Marginal Conditional Stochastic Dominance (MCSD), which can accommodate any return distribution or concave utility function. Our results provide strong evidence that there is a financial price to be paid for socially responsible investing. Indices composed of socially responsible firms are MCSD dominated by trademarked indices composed of conventional firms as well as by indices carefully matched by size and industry with the firms in the SRI indices. Zero cost portfolios created by shorting the SRI index and using the proceeds to invest in the conventional index generate higher average returns, lower variance and higher skewness than either of the two indices standing alone. They also MCSD dominate the SRI and conventional indices standing alone.

Actions (login required)

View Item

Statistics

DownloadsShow export options

Export as CSVXMLJSON

Activity Overview

6 month trend

557Downloads

6 month trend

513Hits

Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.