Resolving whistleblowing disputes in the public interest: is tribunal adjudication the best that can be offered?

Lewis, David B. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8059-0773 (2013) Resolving whistleblowing disputes in the public interest: is tribunal adjudication the best that can be offered? Industrial Law Journal, 42 (1) . pp. 35-53. ISSN 0305-9332 [Article] (doi:10.1093/indlaw/dwt001)

[img]
Preview
PDF (Pre-peer review version) - First submitted uncorrected version (with author's formatting)
Download (141kB) | Preview

Abstract

This article argues that employment tribunal adjudication may be both a difficult and ineffective mechanism for resolving whistleblowing disputes. The author asserts that, if disclosures of serious wrongdoing are to be encouraged, both the law and dispute resolution mechanisms need to be improved. Ideally, employers should have whistleblowing procedures which provide for conciliation, mediation and arbitration as alternative forms of redress for those who feel that their disclosures have not been dealt with properly or have allegedly suffered retaliation. Recognising that a legal obligation to have effective whistleblowing arrangements is unlikely to be imposed by law, the author suggests that alternative dispute resolution mechanisms should be made available where whistleblowing claims are lodged with employment tribunals.

Item Type: Article
Research Areas: A. > School of Law > Law and Politics
Item ID: 11957
Useful Links:
Depositing User: Users 3197 not found.
Date Deposited: 19 Sep 2013 09:54
Last Modified: 19 Jun 2022 13:01
URI: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/id/eprint/11957

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Statistics

Activity Overview
6 month trend
656Downloads
6 month trend
428Hits

Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.