A cautionary note or two, amid the pleasures and pains of participation in performance-making as research.
Melrose, Susan (2011) A cautionary note or two, amid the pleasures and pains of participation in performance-making as research. In: Participatory Research & Learning in the Performing Arts, 6 May 2011, Centre for Creative Collaboration London.
This is the latest version of this item.
Official URL: http://www.sfmelrose.org.uk/pleasure-pain/
What do we understand expertise in the creative and performing arts to mean, when a concern we share here is "creative" research in the HE context? What is the "knowledge status" of expertise, in higher education set-ups in which research is more widely understood to involve publishable writing in certain complex registers? What is the epistemic status of expert-creative decision-making processes in performance-making, when making processes tend to be invisible as such to (expert) spectating, and when the expert-intuitive processing that I argue is constitutive to the making, tends to be rapidly modulated in terms of the equally constitutive logics of expert production? In this presentation I ask whether "posthuman" practice-theoretical writers, on the one hand, and modes of enquiry associated with speculative pragmatism, on the other, might not have something to contribute to this discipline-specific enquiry into performance-making processes.
|Item Type:||Conference or Workshop Item (Keynote)|
|Research Areas:||School of Media and Performing Arts > Performing Arts|
|Deposited On:||23 May 2011 07:44|
|Last Modified:||25 Jul 2014 17:54|
Available Versions of this Item
- A cautionary note or two, amid the pleasures and pains of participation in performance-making as research. (deposited 23 May 2011 07:44) [Currently Displayed]
Repository staff only: item control page
Full text downloads (NB count will be zero if no full text documents are attached to the record)
Downloads per month over the past year