Reservations to the convention on the rights of the child
Schabas, William A. (1996) Reservations to the convention on the rights of the child. Human Rights Quarterly, 18 (2). pp. 472-491. ISSN 0275-0392
Full text is not in this repository.
Official URL: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journal...
This item is available in the Library Catalogue
Forty-seven states parties to the Convention on the Rights of the Child have accompanied their ratification of the instrument with reservations or interpretative declarations intended to limit the scope of their obligations. Thus, although the Convention on the Rights of the Child is now the most successful and widely-ratified human rights treaty, with more than 175 states parties, this impressive support for the instrument is regrettably mitigated by the reservations. Of the few holdouts that have failed to ratify, the United States is surely the most important. Though it signed the treaty in February 1995 without reservation, there can be no doubt that if the United States ever ratifies the Convention this will be associated with a substantial list of reservations should past behavior be any guide. Making reservations to multilateral treaties is a well-accepted practice in international law. It facilitates negotiation of treaties because states know that they may eventually accept an instrument without binding themselves to every single provision. It also encourages ratification, because it is possible for a state to avoid assuming obligations in conflict with certain aspects of its internal legislation.
|Research Areas:||A. Middlesex University Schools and Centres > School of Law > Law and Politics|
|Citations on ISI Web of Science:||6|
|Deposited On:||05 May 2011 08:55|
|Last Modified:||04 Mar 2015 14:39|
Repository staff only: item control page
Full text downloads (NB count will be zero if no full text documents are attached to the record)
Downloads per month over the past year