Darfur and the ‘odious scourge’: the Commission of Inquiry's findings on genocide
Schabas, William A. (2005) Darfur and the ‘odious scourge’: the Commission of Inquiry's findings on genocide. Leiden Journal of International Law, 18 (4). pp. 871-885. ISSN 0922-1565
Full text is not in this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0922156505003031
This item is available in the Library Catalogue
The report of the International Commission of Inquiry on Darfur, set up pursuant to a UN Security Council resolution, is an important contribution to the evolving law of genocide. The Commission concluded that genocide had not been committed, but that the case should be referred to the International Criminal Court for prosecution as crimes against humanity and war crimes. The Commission did not find significant evidence of genocidal intent. It looked essentially for a plan or policy of the Sudanese state and, in its absence, concluded that genocide was not being committed. The Commission endorsed the ‘stable and permanent groups’ approach taken by one trial chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). On this point, it exaggerated the acceptance of this interpretation, which has been ignored by other trial chambers of the international tribunals. However, the Commission found that the better approach to determination of the groups covered by the Convention is subjective, and that the targeted tribes in Darfur meet this criterion.
|Research Areas:||A. Middlesex University Schools and Centres > School of Law > Law and Politics|
|Deposited On:||19 Apr 2011 06:30|
|Last Modified:||23 Feb 2015 15:43|
Repository staff only: item control page
Full text downloads (NB count will be zero if no full text documents are attached to the record)
Downloads per month over the past year