Are acquired dyslexias and dysgraphias language: specific or universal?
Raman, Ilhan (2006) Are acquired dyslexias and dysgraphias language: specific or universal? The Iranian Journal of Contemporary Psychology, 1 (2). ISSN 1735-4587
The aim of the current paper is to provide a review of the neuropsychology of acquired reading and writing impairments from an orthographic transparency perspective within the dual-route framework. Orthographic transparency refers to the ease with which one can directly predict phonology (sound) from orthography (print) in a given alphabetic writing system. Writing systems with highly predictable mappings between print and sound are said to be transparent (e.g. Turkish, Italian, Spanish) whilst unpredictable mappings between print and sound lead to opaque writing systems (e.g. English, French, Arabic). In addition, in some orthographies (such as Persian) transparent and opaque words coexist in print. The impact of orthographic transparency on normal (and impaired) language processing has led to the development of at least two opposing views, namely the orthographic depth hypothesis and the universal hypothesis. Ultimately the objective here is to demonstrate how neurological damage to the language area in the brain is linked to acquired dyslexia and dysgraphia irrespective of orthographic transparency. That is, neurological damage to the brain yields impairments that are universal in nature but perhaps manifested in a different way depending on the specific characteristics of the language. Evidence from atypically transparent Turkish orthography will be utilised to argue in favour of the universal hypothesis.
Also published in Contemporary Psychology, (ISSN: 0010-7549.) Fall, 2006 Vol 1 no 2. p.18-24.
|Research Areas:||School of Health and Education > Psychology|
|Citations on ISI Web of Science:||12|
|Deposited On:||14 Apr 2011 10:17|
|Last Modified:||19 Jul 2014 09:47|
Repository staff and depositor only: item control page
Full text downloads (NB count will be zero if no full text documents are attached to the record)
Downloads per month over the past year