How would you like to be assessed? The correlates of students’ preferences for assessment methods.
Furnham, Adrian and Batey, Mark and Martin, G. Neil (2011) How would you like to be assessed? The correlates of students’ preferences for assessment methods. Personality and Individual Differences, 50 (2). pp. 259-263. ISSN 0191-8869
Full text is not in this repository.
Official URL: http://tinyurl.com/4wc25xt
This item is available in the Library Catalogue
This study is concerned with individual correlates of students’ preferences for different examination methods. The aim was to examine the incremental validity of learning approaches, intelligence and personality (Big Five traits) in predicting the preferences for six different assessment methods. Four hundred and ten British students from three British Universities completed a general intelligence test, a personality test, a measure on their Approach to Learning and a university assessment-method preference test that specified six different methods. Students favoured Multiple Choice and Continuous Assessment most, and Oral and Group Work least. Deep learning style and Openness to Experience were the most consistent predictors of assessment preferences. The three sets of measures accounted for between 9% and 29% of the variance in preferences for different methods. Specific learning approaches and personality traits, but not intelligence are clearly linked to preferences for assessment.
|Research Areas:||School of Science and Technology > Psychology|
|Deposited On:||02 Mar 2011 11:20|
|Last Modified:||10 Oct 2013 04:59|
Repository staff only: item control page
Full text downloads (NB count will be zero if no full text documents are attached to the record)
Downloads per month over the past year