Gender, language and floor apportionment in political debates.
Shaw, Sylvia (2000) Gender, language and floor apportionment in political debates. Discourse and Society, 11 (3). pp. 401-418. ISSN 0957-9265
Full text is not in this repository.
Official URL: http://das.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/11/3/4...
This item is available in the Library Catalogue
Political debates are speech events which foreground issues of power and the `floor', and allow the opportunity of assessing the ways in which the gender of participants affects their construction as more or less powerful participants in debates. Debates in the British House of Commons are adversarial in style, making it appropriate to view the floor as `the site of a contest where there is a winner and a loser'. Previous research into political debates has found that male participants violate the formal rules in debates more than their female counterparts, in order to gain the floor. Although the canonical form and rules of debates exist to `permit the equalization of turns', rule violations are common, and inequalities between participants exist. In this article legal and illegal interventions are evaluated in five debates in order to establish the extent to which the gender of participants is related to the control that an individual has over the debate floor.
|Research Areas:||Middlesex University Schools and Centres > School of Media and Performing Arts > Media > English Language and Literature|
|Citations on ISI Web of Science:||12|
|Deposited On:||04 May 2010 10:34|
|Last Modified:||05 Nov 2014 16:37|
Repository staff only: item control page
Full text downloads (NB count will be zero if no full text documents are attached to the record)
Downloads per month over the past year