Traditional Communication Formats v SGML, Metadata, Dublin Core: Traditional Communication Formats: MARC is far from dead

Hopkinson, Alan (1994) Traditional Communication Formats v SGML, Metadata, Dublin Core: Traditional Communication Formats: MARC is far from dead. In: Traditional Communication Formats v SGML, Metadata, Dublin Core, 1995, Vilnius, National Library of Lithuania.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (86kB)

Abstract

This section is entitled Traditional Communication Formats v SGML, Metadata, Dublin Core. Is there a
subject here that needs to be debated?
I hope to show that the two, the traditional and the more recent formats, are complimentary not adversary. But
to do this I need to explain why there is even a feeling that the traditional and the new might be opposed. I
need to explain why the question has been asked.
I am going to try and answer two questions: Do we still need MARC?; and Are MARC and the other 'formats'
competing for the same role?

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Research Areas: A. > Library and Student Support
Item ID: 5197
Depositing User: Repository team
Date Deposited: 15 Apr 2010 17:36
Last Modified: 30 Sep 2015 14:23
URI: http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/id/eprint/5197

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item

Full text downloads (NB count will be zero if no full text documents are attached to the record)

Downloads per month over the past year