Factors influencing subjective ranking of driver distractions.
Full text is not in this repository.
This item is available in the Library Catalogue
Driver distraction is recognised as a significant cause of road traffic incidents. However, the more objective measurement and ranking of the relative importance of individual distractions in contributing to incidents tend to differ from subjectively-held rankings. To investigate this, the present study examines qualitative characteristics of 14 driver distractions to determine if these characteristics might explain the discrepancy. The conclusion is that for laypersons, qualitative characteristics, such as equity and familiarity, do contribute to their ranking of driver distractions. This poses some interesting issues for risk managers. For example, should safety interventions aimed at driver distractions be based purely on factual data and life-saving potential, or should they accommodate qualitative factors of salience to the public?
|Research Areas:||A. Middlesex University Schools and Centres > School of Science and Technology|
A. Middlesex University Schools and Centres > School of Science and Technology > Centre for Decision Analysis and Risk Management (DARM)
A. Middlesex University Schools and Centres > School of Science and Technology > Natural Sciences
|Citations on ISI Web of Science:||6|
|Deposited On:||05 Apr 2010 07:45|
|Last Modified:||06 Feb 2015 16:33|
Repository staff only: item control page
Full text downloads (NB count will be zero if no full text documents are attached to the record)
Downloads per month over the past year