Need for closure and coercion in inter-group conflicts: experimental evidence for the mitigating effect of accessible conflict schemas
Golec de Zavala, Agnieszka and Federico, Christopher and Cisłak, Aleksandra and Sigger, Jonathan (2008) Need for closure and coercion in inter-group conflicts: experimental evidence for the mitigating effect of accessible conflict schemas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38 (1). pp. 84-105. ISSN 0046-2772
Official URL: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/1142505...
This item is available in the Library Catalogue
Three experimental studies demonstrate that momentarily-accessible conflict-schemas moderate the relationship between need for closure and conflict-strategy preferences, with the relationship between a high need for closure and increased competitiveness reduced to non-significance when a cooperative conflict schema is made salient but strengthened when a hostile one is activated. Study 1 manipulated the accessibility of competitive versus cooperative conflict schemas using different descriptions of a contemporary political conflict, while Studies 2 and 3 manipulated conflict-schema accessibility using primes embedded in an ostensibly-unrelated lexical decision task. Together, the present studies provide a strong pattern of experimental support for the moderating effect of conflict-schema accessibility suggested by earlier correlational studies. The implications for conflict reduction are discussed.
|Research Areas:||School of Health and Education > Psychology|
|Deposited On:||01 Mar 2010 15:52|
|Last Modified:||24 Jul 2014 21:31|
Repository staff only: item control page
Full text downloads (NB count will be zero if no full text documents are attached to the record)
Downloads per month over the past year