Using personality type differences to form engineering design teams.
Shen, Siu-Tsen and Prior, Stephen D. and White, Anthony S. and Karamanoglu, Mehmet (2007) Using personality type differences to form engineering design teams. Engineering Education, 2 (2). pp. 54-66. ISSN 1750-0052
Full text is not in this repository.
Official URL: http://www.engsc.ac.uk/journal/index.php/ee/articl...
This item is available in the Library Catalogue
This paper argues for the greater use of personality type instruments such as the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and the Keirsey Temperament Sorter II (KTS II), when forming engineering design teams. Considering the importance of teamwork in all aspects of education and industry, it is surprising that few universities in the UK use personality type information when forming design teams. This has led to many courses not getting the best out of their students, and more importantly the students not getting the most out of the teamworking experience. Various team formation methods are discussed and their relative strengths and weaknesses outlined. Normal personality type distributions in base populations are presented and compared with data from recent studies of engineering students, and the link between engineering, design and creativity is discussed. The results of this study have shown that the most important of the type preferences is the Sensing-iNtuitive (S-N) scale, with its proven link to creativity and learning styles. It is concluded that both engineers and designers have much in common, and a methodology of using personality type choice sets to select and form engineering design teams is proposed.
|Research Areas:||Middlesex University Schools and Centres > School of Science and Technology > Design Engineering and Mathematics|
|Deposited On:||16 Feb 2010 11:42|
|Last Modified:||28 Oct 2014 18:00|
Repository staff only: item control page
Full text downloads (NB count will be zero if no full text documents are attached to the record)
Downloads per month over the past year