Modernity is a qualitative, not a chronological, category.
Osborne, Peter (1992) Modernity is a qualitative, not a chronological, category. New Left Review (I/192). pp. 65-84. ISSN 0028-6060
Full text is not in this repository.
Official URL: http://www.newleftreview.org/?page=article&view=16...
This item is available in the Library Catalogue
Few thickets are more tangled than that in which the idea of modernity has become enmeshed, few topics less likely to inspire confidence than the question of its relations to the ‘postmodern’. Not least of the problems concerns the character and status of the concept of modernity itself. For it is far from clear that the main figures in recent debates have been writing about, and disputing, the same set of issues when the term has been used. This is of course, in one sense, precisely the point: it is the meaning of ‘modernity’ that is in dispute, and the argument is hardly just terminological. Nonetheless, there remains considerable scope for reflection about what kind of concept ‘modernity’ is, and in particular for a more systematic consideration of the relations between its various uses. What follows is offered as a preliminary contribution to this task.
|Research Areas:||A. Middlesex University Schools and Centres > School of Media and Performing Arts|
|Citations on ISI Web of Science:||8|
|Deposited On:||11 Feb 2010 05:43|
|Last Modified:||27 Feb 2015 16:19|
Repository staff only: item control page
Full text downloads (NB count will be zero if no full text documents are attached to the record)
Downloads per month over the past year