The experience of long stay in high and medium secure psychiatric hospitals in England: qualitative study of the patient perspective

Holley, Jessica, Weaver, Tim ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3437-3556 and Völlm, Birgit (2020) The experience of long stay in high and medium secure psychiatric hospitals in England: qualitative study of the patient perspective. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 14 (1) , 25. pp. 1-12. ISSN 1752-4458 (doi:10.1186/s13033-020-00358-7)

[img] PDF - Published version (with publisher's formatting)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Background: Some forensic patients in England remain in secure care for long, possibly unnecessarily prolonged, periods, raising significant ethical and resource issues. Research focused on the patients in secure care has examined quality of life and service provision but not the perspectives of patients experiencing long stays. This study explored how long stay patients experience secure care, what factors they felt influenced long stay, and its impact upon treatment engagement and motivation to progress.

Methods: Embedded within a larger epidemiological study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of forty long stay patients from two high and six medium secure hospitals. Long stay was defined as a 5 years stay in medium secure care or 10 years in high secure care, or 15 years in a combination of high and medium secure. Transcripts were subject to thematic analysis, and narrative analysis at individual case level to explore the relationship between emergent themes.

Results: Four themes emerged illustrating participants’ attribution, outlook, approach, and readiness for change. A typology of four long stay stances was developed (dynamic acceptance, dynamic resistance, static acceptance, static resistance). These illustrate differences in the extent to which participants believed being in secure care helped them to get better, and actively work towards progression and leaving secure care. There were considerable differences in how patients adopting these stances attributed the reasons for their long stay, they viewed their future, and their motivation to progress. Negative perceptions arose from excessive restrictions, treatment repetition and changes in therapeutic relationships, leading some patients to exhibiting tokenistic engagement and low motivation to progress.

Conclusions: Planning care for long stay patients in secure psychiatric settings should take account of the differing stances patient’s adopt towards engagement and progression. Service providers should be mindful of these stances and provide patients with individualised opportunities to progress through the secure care treatment pathway, avoiding treatment repetition and maintaining continuity in key professional relationships. Refocusing on quality of life may be appropriate for some long-term patients who are unwilling or unable to move on. For some long-term patients, purpose designed long stay setting may be appropriate.

Item Type: Article
Keywords (uncontrolled): Research, Forensic mental health, Length of stay, Long stay patients, Mentally disordered offenders, Secure care, Qualitative interviews, Thematic content analysis, Narrative analysis
Research Areas: A. > School of Science and Technology > Psychology
Item ID: 30334
Notes on copyright: © The Author(s) 2020.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Useful Links:
Depositing User: Jisc Publications Router
Date Deposited: 08 Jun 2020 15:15
Last Modified: 11 Jun 2020 13:48
URI: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/id/eprint/30334

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item

Full text downloads (NB count will be zero if no full text documents are attached to the record)

Downloads per month over the past year