Systematic review of approaches to using patient experience data for quality improvement in healthcare settings

Gleeson, Helen ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0505-5281, Calderon, Ana, Swami, Viren, Deighton, Jessica, Wolpert, Miranda and Edbrooke-Childs, Julian (2016) Systematic review of approaches to using patient experience data for quality improvement in healthcare settings. BMJ Open, 6 (8) , e011907. pp. 1-11. (doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011907)

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published version (with publisher's formatting)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial.

Download (85kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objectives: Explore how patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are collected, communicated and used to inform quality improvement (QI) across healthcare settings.

Design: Systematic review.

Setting: Various primary and secondary care settings, including general practice, and acute and chronic care hospitals.

Participants: A full range of patient populations from (children through to the elderly) and staff (from healthcare practitioners to senior managers).

Methods: Scientific databases were searched (CINAHL, PsycINFO, MEDLINE and Cochrane Libraries) as was grey literature. Qualitative and quantitative studies describing collection of PREM data and subsequent QI actions in any healthcare setting were included. Risk of bias was assessed using established criteria. Of 5312 initial hits, 32 full texts were screened, and 11 were included.

Results: Patient experience data were most commonly collected through surveys and used to identify small areas of incremental change to services that do not require a change to clinician behaviour (eg, changes to admission processes and producing educational materials). While staff in most studies reported having made effective improvements, authors struggled to identify what those changes were or the impact they had.

Conclusions: Findings suggest there is no single best way to collect or use PREM data for QI, but they do suggest some key points to consider when planning such an approach. For instance, formal training is recommended, as a lack of expertise in QI and confidence in interpreting patient experience data effectively may continue to be a barrier to a successful shift towards a more patient-centred healthcare service. In the context of QI, more attention is required on how patient experience data will be used to inform changes to practice and, in turn, measure any impact these changes may have on patient experience.

Item Type: Article
Research Areas: A. > School of Health and Education > Mental Health, Social Work and Interprofessional Learning
Item ID: 28257
Notes on copyright: Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Useful Links:
Depositing User: Helen Gleeson
Date Deposited: 21 Nov 2019 09:12
Last Modified: 22 Nov 2019 12:14
URI: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/id/eprint/28257

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item

Full text downloads (NB count will be zero if no full text documents are attached to the record)

Downloads per month over the past year