Does advertising pervert higher education? The case for resistance
Gibbs, Paul (2007) Does advertising pervert higher education? The case for resistance. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 17 (1). pp. 3-11. ISSN 0884-1241
Full text is not in this repository.
My argument is that when marketing-particularly advertising-may, under certain circumstances, work against the goals of autonomous, liberal higher education by undermining critical thinking and independent actions.
This argument requires that advertising has a primary intent to persuade rather than inform; that by being intrusive, invasive and manipulative it is potentially exploitative and that this exploitation can harm the goal of an education for a common good. Should it do this then it becomes morally problematic.
|Research Areas:||A. > Centre for Education Research and Scholarship (CERS)
A. > School of Health and Education
|Depositing User:||Users 36 not found.|
|Date Deposited:||24 Jun 2009 07:44|
|Last Modified:||14 Dec 2015 14:00|
Actions (login required)