Does the use of summative peer assessment in collaborative group work inhibit good judgement?

Sridharan, Bhavani, Tai, Joanna and Boud, David ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6883-2722 (2019) Does the use of summative peer assessment in collaborative group work inhibit good judgement? Higher Education, 77 (5). pp. 853-870. ISSN 0018-1560

[img] PDF - Final accepted version (with author's formatting)
Restricted to Repository staff and depositor only until 22 August 2019.

Download (476kB) |

Abstract

The accuracy and consistency of peer marking, particularly when students have the power to reward (or penalise) during formative and summative assessment regimes, is largely unknown. The objective of this study is to evaluate students’ ability and behaviour in marking their peers’ teamwork performance in a collaborative group assessment context both when the mark is counted and not counted towards their final grade. Formative and summative assessment data were obtained from 98 participants in anonymous self and peer assessment of team members’ contributions to a group assessment in business courses. The findings indicate that students are capable of accurately and consistently judging their peers’ performance to a large extent, especially in the formative evaluation of the process component of group work. However, the findings suggest significant peer grading bias when peer marks contribute to final grades. Overall, findings suggest that students are reluctant to honestly assess their peers when they realise that their actions can penalise non-contributing students. This raises questions about the appropriateness of using peer marks for summative assessment purposes. To overcome the problems identified, this paper proposes a number of measures to guide educators in effectively embedding summative peer assessment in a group assessment context

Item Type: Article
Research Areas: A. > School of Health and Education > Education
A. > Work and Learning Research Centre
Item ID: 25805
Notes on copyright: This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Higher Education. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0305-7
Useful Links:
Depositing User: Repository team
Date Deposited: 12 Dec 2018 15:54
Last Modified: 24 Jul 2019 13:06
URI: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/id/eprint/25805

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item

Full text downloads (NB count will be zero if no full text documents are attached to the record)

Downloads per month over the past year