Gratuitously offensive speech and the political debate

Howard, Erica (2016) Gratuitously offensive speech and the political debate. European Human Rights Law Review, 6 . pp. 636-644. ISSN 1361-1526

[img]
Preview
PDF - Final accepted version (with author's formatting)
Download (387kB) | Preview

Abstract

Anti-immigration and anti-Islam rhetoric has become part of political discourse. This raises questions about, on the one hand, politicians’ freedom of expression and, on the other hand, the duty not to be gratuitously offensive. How can these two be reconciled? Can and should political speech be curtailed for being (gratuitously) offensive? If so, where does this leave a politician’s right to freedom of expression? These questions are the main focus of this article and the case law of the European Court Human Rights will be used in the analysis.

Item Type: Article
Research Areas: A. > School of Law
A. > School of Law > Law and Politics
Item ID: 20780
Notes on copyright: This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in European Human Rights Law Review following peer review. The definitive published version - Howard, E.,(2016) 'Gratuitously offensive speech and the political debate', E.H.R.L.R. 2016, 6, 636-644 - is available online on Westlaw UK (http://legalresearch.westlaw.co.uk/) or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service(http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/our-businesses/docdel.aspx)
Useful Links:
Depositing User: Erica Howard
Date Deposited: 25 Oct 2016 09:12
Last Modified: 05 Apr 2019 02:22
URI: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/id/eprint/20780

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item

Full text downloads (NB count will be zero if no full text documents are attached to the record)

Downloads per month over the past year