Growing against gangs and violence (GAGV): findings from a process and outcome evaluation

Densley, James, Adler, Joanna R. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2973-8503, Zhu, Lijun and Lambine, Mackenzie Erica (2016) Growing against gangs and violence (GAGV): findings from a process and outcome evaluation. Psychology of Violence . ISSN 2152-0828 (Published online first) (doi:10.1037/vio0000054)

[img]
Preview
PDF - Final accepted version (with author's formatting)
Download (608kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objective: The present study assesses program efficacy of Growing Against Gangs and Violence (GAGV), a primary prevention partnership with the UK Metropolitan Police Service, delivered in London schools with the aim of reducing gang involvement, delinquency, and violent offending and improving young people’s confidence in police. GAGV is partially derived from an American program, Gangs Resistance Education and Training (GREAT).

Method: A qualitative process evaluation and randomized control trial outcomes study were undertaken.

Results: Findings indicate GAGV personnel were keen to enhance program fidelity and process implementation. The RCT did not demonstrate a statistically significant program effect. However, effect sizes indicate the program was effective in reducing levels of gang membership and the frequency and variety of delinquency and violence in the short- and longer term. More robust evidence indicated GAGV also improved students’ attitudes toward police and reduced their adherence toward street code.

Conclusions: The use of cohort- (not individual-) level data and missing data in the one-year follow-up make it difficult to draw reliable and robust conclusions. However, results are encouraging. Several recommendations are suggested for GAGV, including curriculum design, regular evaluations, and expanding to include more schools. Limitations of this and similar evaluations also are discussed.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: The authors are grateful for the contribution made by Dr. Miranda A. H. Horvath to the process evaluation
Research Areas: A. > School of Science and Technology > Psychology > Forensic Psychology Research Group
Item ID: 18886
Notes on copyright: © American Psychological Association. "This article may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record."
Useful Links:
Depositing User: Joanna Adler
Date Deposited: 19 Feb 2016 12:06
Last Modified: 31 Oct 2019 21:04
URI: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/id/eprint/18886

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item

Full text downloads (NB count will be zero if no full text documents are attached to the record)

Downloads per month over the past year