Managing five paradoxes of knowledge exchange in networked organizatiuons: new priorities for HRM?

Mabey, Chris and Zhao, Shasha (2017) Managing five paradoxes of knowledge exchange in networked organizatiuons: new priorities for HRM? Human Resource Management Journal . ISSN 0954-5395

PDF - Published version (with publisher's formatting)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives.

Download (284kB) | Preview


The life-blood of most organizations is knowledge. Too often, the very mechanisms set up to facilitate knowledge-flow militate against it. This is because they are instituted in a top-down way, they are cumbersome to manage and the bridges of trust fail to get built. In their thirst for innovation, the tendency is for firms to set up elaborate transmission channels and governance systems. As a result, staff are drowned in a deluge of mundane intranet messages and bewildered by matrix structures, while off-the-wall ideas and mold-breaking insights are routinely missed. Added to this is the challenge of operating across professional, cultural, regional and linguistic boundaries, where ways of sharing knowledge differ markedly, even within the same project team. Drawing upon extensive research with scientists in the ATLAS collaboration (a high-energy particle physics experiment comprising 3,500 scientists from 38 countries) we explore five paradoxes associated with knowledge exchange in global networks. Each paradox leads to a proposition which takes the theory and practice of knowledge management in a fresh direction. We conclude by outlining a number of HRM priorities for international knowledge-intensive organizations.

Item Type: Article
Keywords (uncontrolled): knowledge management; paradoxes; international networks; R&D; HRM
Research Areas: A. > Business School > Leadership, Work and Organisations
Item ID: 18822
Useful Links:
Depositing User: Chris Mabey
Date Deposited: 09 Feb 2016 13:21
Last Modified: 12 Nov 2018 23:50

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item

Full text downloads (NB count will be zero if no full text documents are attached to the record)

Downloads per month over the past year