Need for closure and competition in intergroup conflicts: experimental evidence for the mitigating effect of accessible conflict-schemas

Golec de Zavala, Agnieszka, Federico, Christopher M., Cisłak, Aleksandra and Sigger, Jonathan (2008) Need for closure and competition in intergroup conflicts: experimental evidence for the mitigating effect of accessible conflict-schemas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38 (1) . pp. 84-105. ISSN 0046-2772 (doi:10.1002/ejsp.438)

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published version (with publisher's formatting)
Download (230kB) | Preview

Abstract

Three experimental studies demonstrate that momentarily accessible conflict-schemas moderate the relationship between need for closure and conflict-strategy preferences, with the relationship between a high need for closure and increased competitiveness reduced to non-significance when a cooperative conflict-schema is made salient but strengthened when a hostile one is activated. Study 1 manipulated the accessibility of competitive versus cooperative conflict-schemas using different descriptions of a contemporary political conflict, while Studies 2 and 3 manipulated conflict-schema accessibility using primes embedded in an ostensibly unrelated lexical decision task. Together, the present studies provide a strong pattern of experimental support for the moderating effect of conflict-schema accessibility suggested by earlier correlational studies. The implications for conflict reduction are discussed. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Item Type: Article
Research Areas: A. > School of Science and Technology > Psychology > Applied Health Psychology group
Item ID: 17568
Useful Links:
Depositing User: Jonathan Sigger
Date Deposited: 18 Sep 2015 15:48
Last Modified: 01 Jun 2019 17:19
URI: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/id/eprint/17568

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item

Full text downloads (NB count will be zero if no full text documents are attached to the record)

Downloads per month over the past year