Identifying differences in the experience of (in)authenticity: a latent class analysis approach

Lenton, Alison P., Slabu, Letitia ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7050-2474, Bruder, Martin and Sedikides, Constantine (2014) Identifying differences in the experience of (in)authenticity: a latent class analysis approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 5 , 770. ISSN 1664-1078 (doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00770)

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published version (with publisher's formatting)
Download (766kB) | Preview
[img] PDF - Final accepted version (with author's formatting)
Restricted to Repository staff and depositor only

Download (542kB)

Abstract

Generally, psychologists consider state authenticity– that is, the subjective sense of being one’s true self – to be a unitary and unidimensional construct, such that (a) the phenomenological experience of authenticity is thought to be similar no matter its trigger, and (b) inauthenticity is thought to be simply the opposing pole (on the same underlying construct) of authenticity. Using latent class analysis, we put this conceptualization to a test. In order to avoid over-reliance on a Western conceptualization of authenticity, we used a cross-cultural sample (N = 543), comprising participants from Western, South-Asian, East-Asian, and South-East Asian cultures. Participants provided either a narrative in which the described when they felt most like being themselves or one in which they described when they felt least like being themselves. The analysis identified six distinct classes of experiences: two authenticity classes ('everyday' and 'extraordinary'), three inauthenticity classes ('self-conscious,' 'deflated,' and 'extraordinary'), and a class representing convergence between authenticity and inauthenticity. The classes were phenomenologically distinct, especially with respect to negative affect, private and public self-consciousness, and self-esteem. Furthermore, relatively more interdependent cultures were less likely to report experiences of extraordinary (in)authenticity than relatively more independent cultures. Understanding the many facets of (in)authenticity may enable researchers to connect different findings and explain why the attainment of authenticity can be difficult.

Item Type: Article
Keywords (uncontrolled): authenticity, inauthenticity, latent class analysis, self, culture
Research Areas: A. > School of Science and Technology > Psychology
Item ID: 15543
Notes on copyright: © 2014 Lenton, Slabu, Bruder and Sedikides. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Useful Links:
Depositing User: Letitia Slabu
Date Deposited: 29 Apr 2015 15:27
Last Modified: 07 Jun 2020 08:32
URI: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/id/eprint/15543

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item

Full text downloads (NB count will be zero if no full text documents are attached to the record)

Downloads per month over the past year