Can pictures have explicatures?

Forceville, Charles and Clark, Billy (2014) Can pictures have explicatures? Linguagem Em Discurso, 14 (3). pp. 451-472. ISSN 1982-4017

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published version (with publisher's formatting)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper considers the question of whether pictures can be understood to give rise to explicit meanings. In relevance-theoretic terms, this means asking whether pictures give rise to ‘explicatures’. The definition of the term ‘explicature’ seems to rule out this possibility except in cases where pictures include or are accompanied by material with coded meanings. The paper considers a range of non-verbal phenomena with coded meanings, including pictograms (Forceville 2011, Forceville et al 2014). It then considers whether the explicature-implicature distinction could be relevant to pictures without such elements. Some assumptions communicated by pictures seem to be more ‘explicature-like’ than others, so it is possible that the distinction will be useful. The question is not merely terminological as the discussion leads to a fuller understanding of ways in which pictures communicate.

Item Type: Article
Research Areas: A. > School of Media and Performing Arts > Media > English Language and Literature
Item ID: 13961
Notes on copyright: Permission granted to make available here 13th August 2014
Depositing User: Billy Clark
Date Deposited: 03 Dec 2014 11:10
Last Modified: 04 Apr 2019 05:54
URI: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/id/eprint/13961

Available Versions of this Item

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item

Full text downloads (NB count will be zero if no full text documents are attached to the record)

Downloads per month over the past year